Category

Contractor Law

What is Force Majeure?

By | Contractor Law | No Comments

EVERYTHING OLD IS NEW AGAIN

OR

THE CONTRACTUAL DEFENSE OF FORCE MAJEURE MAY BE BACK IN VOGUE

An act of God may sound biblical and it may even be biblical, but for lawyers, it has a very contractual meaning. It is generally found in the “Force Majeure” escape clause in some contracts. It is rarely used. In Indiana there are only a handful of cases that even deal with the topic, so finding a way to apply it to our lives in January of 2020 might seem out of place. But in March of 2020, less than two months after the first confirmed case of Coronavirus (Covid-19) was documented in Washington State, we are living in a whole new world.

A “Force Majeure” clause is a contractual provision found in many contracts, typically in commercial leases, that sets forth the criteria by which one or more parties may be relieved of their obligations to perform under the lease in the event something overwhelming prevents a party from performing. Of course, not just any event will be sufficient, it will generally require that the event be so overwhelming as to render performance impossible and not merely inconvenient.

A typical force majeure clause might look like this:

“Force majeure” is defined as any unforseeable causes beyond the control and without fault or negligence of the party affected thereby, such as Acts of God, acts of the public enemy, insurrections, riots, labor disputes, labor or material shortages, fires, explosions, floods, breakdowns of or damage to plants, equipment or facilities, interruptions to transportation, river freeze-ups, embargoes, orders or acts of civil or military authority, or other causes of a similar nature which wholly or partly prevent the mining, delivery and/or loading of coal by the Seller, or the receiving, transportation and/or delivery of the coal by (insert company here), or the accepting, utilizing and/or unloading of the coal by (insert other company here).

In the weeks and months ahead, governments, Federal, State and local, will be forced to issue public safety orders that will make operating some businesses impossible. Those orders coupled with the economic disaster and the need for social distancing may very well cause a great many businesses and individuals to seek some sort of relief from their contractual obligations. In the shadow of this pandemic, the “force majeure” defense will be a hot topic.

Caronavirus Attorney

Handling a Legal Case In the Middle of a Pandemic

By | Collections, Contractor Law, Family Law, Liens, Mechanic's Lien, Personal Injury, Probate, Real Estate Law, Wills | No Comments

Corona Virus

…and your legal cases

As of March 16, 2020, it is clear America is in the fight of its life against an invisible foe known as Covid-19 aka the coronavirus. This foreign invader grows faster than compound interest. It is a true monster with exponential superpowers. In the course of 55 days (the number of days since the first American was confirmed to have this virus to now), this virus caused one of the strongest bull markets in stock market history to lose three years of gains and send a thriving economy into a recession.

With no cure or vaccine to fight it, self-imposed quarantining is the only way to slow its spread. Scientists do not even talk in terms of “stopping it”, their best hope is to merely slow it down while an under prepared healthcare system struggles to catch up. This is what has been described as flattening the curve. While older citizens with chronic health problems are believed to be the most vulnerable, young healthy people can spread the virus and that makes this a battle that everyone must join. It requires nearly complete cooperation.

The businesses most immediately impacted by this pandemic are those that rely on crowds to gather in their restaurants, gyms, and theaters, or at their stadiums, convention halls, or theme parks. If not now, sometime soon, even businesses who don’t depend upon crowds will feel the pressure of this pandemic as they depend on other businesses or those businesses employees to sustain their cash flow.

Some businesses will continue to operate as their employees work from home or work in isolation zones within the business itself. In the end, everyone will be negatively impacted. “What should we do”, you ask? There are certainly some very fundamental things all Americans must do now.

1. Get informed and stay informed. Listen to credible sources of news and information. Avoid unreliable sources. Currently, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) is deemed a reliable source.

2. Honor the Federal, State, and local governments mandates on travel restrictions, business closures, and self-quarantine.

3. Be prepared, if necessary, to reinvent yourself. It may turn out that unemployed workers, such as waitresses and bar tenders or even out-of-work lawyers (for example), will need to be trained to work in special coronavirus wards to help fight this pandemic.

4. Prioritize your spending, if you have limited resources.

5. Be part of the solution by thinking of ways you can help keep businesses moving while protecting patrons. (I have a vision of a movie theater full of movie goers in hazmat suits).

6. Help those who need help. Give of yourself.

BUT WHAT ABOUT MY CASE?

Caronavirus AttorneyYes, indeed, you have legal issues and you may be wondering what all this means for your particular case. Most law offices are prepared with a continuity plan for emergencies like this. Lawyers can do much of what they do from home. They can continue to work on your case, generally, without the need to meet with you in person or to leave home, as long as they have a computer and a link to the internet.

For cases that are transactional in nature, such as preparing a Will or a Trust or a contract or forming a new business, lawyers are will suited to accomplish this work from their couch or home office. If your case is a matter pending before a court of law, then some work can be done outside of court by your lawyer working from home, but where hearings or trial are concerned, courts around the country are continuing trials and postponing everything on their calendars for the foreseeable future. This may be good, if you are a reluctant participant desiring to postpone the inevitable, but it may be bad, if you want your day in court so justice can prevail.

Some legal disputes avoid court all together where the parties agree to submit their dispute to an arbitrator or arbitration panel. These arrangements are typically worked out in advance by inserting these agreements into a contract. However, sometimes litigants make the decision to have an arbitrator decide their case after the dispute arises. This might be the case where they desire to have the matter decided quickly and avoid the long delays often forced upon traditional litigants in the trial courts.

The pandemic is changing the dynamics of everyday life in so many ways it is difficult to anticipate everything that will impact us. However, it is reasonable to expect many litigants who desire a quick resolution to their dispute to agree to submit their case to an arbitrator and therefore the demand for arbitration services is very likely to explode over the next few weeks and months.
Where litigants are cash starved, they may actually benefit from these delays as it will permit them to modulate their cash flow with the circumstances impacting the court’s calendar. Being cash starved may also compel those who are desperate for cash to settle for less than they might otherwise accept under normal circumstances.

All litigants must take care to at least file their claims timely in order to avoid statutes of limitation and for that reason, even where cash or the lack of it is a concern, talking this point through with an attorney could enable them to anchor their claim now while delaying the progression of the procedural process. Some things just can’t wait.

If you are not impacted by cash flow and you have the means to bring or defend a case, you should know that most every lawyer in practice today will be able to assist you, provided they can work from home and have access to the internet. Hopefully, the coronavirus will not alter that in the future.

Attorneys at Indy Advocate

Real Estate Attorney

You MUST Read This Before Buying a New House

By | Contractor Law, Real Estate Law | No Comments

NEW HOME BUYERS BEWARE

BE VERY AWARE!

For most Americans, the purchase of a new home is the fulfillment of the American Dream. It’s an opportunity to own a piece of the Earth, an opportunity to build wealth and financial security. But all too often that opportunity turns into a nightmare. Even when you hire real estate professionals to guide you through the maze of potential issues, it’s easy to come out on the short end of the stick.

“What could go wrong,” you ask? This article will discuss some of the more common problems that arise when purchasing residential real estate in the State of Indiana. While some of the issues described in this article might be a concern in any state, this discussion will focus on Indiana real estate and Indiana law as it applies to these concerns.

Problems most commonly suffered by purchasers of residential real estate in Indiana include:

1. Purchase agreement disputes;

2. Title issues;

2. Hidden defects within the building structure;

3. Boundary encroachments;

4. Zoning problems;

5. Easement issues;

6. Insect infestation;

7. Hazardous materials;

8. Neighborhood covenant issues;

9. Predatory lending;

10. Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act;

11. Fraud;

12. Warranty issues;

13. Mold problems.

PURCHASE AGREEMENT DISPUTES

A contract for the sale of real estate is not enforceable in the State of Indiana, unless it is in writing and signed by both parties to the sale. Therefore, a written contract is the generally accepted means of purchasing and selling real estate. When you think about the myriad of issues that give rise to conflicts during a real estate transaction, there should be no doubt about the importance of a written agreement. Real estate professionals typically use boilerplate forms, which are tried and proven in their ability to address most of the contingencies that might arise between the time the offer is made and the time the closing is concluded. However, despite the best laid plans of the drafters and the real estate professionals who fill in the blanks, things often go wrong.

Buyers and sellers need to be concerned about such things as deadlines for submission of earnest money, deadlines for closing, insurance coverage up to the transfer of ownership and thereafter, right to inspect the property, right to withdraw the offer, right to make repairs, right to possession, responsibility for property taxes, express and implied warranties, what appliances and other personal property stay with the real estate, and more. By reaching agreement on these issues at the inception of the contract, the parties can expect to avoid problems later. When contingencies arise, some parties find themselves inextricably shackled to a legal problem and those legal problems are often complex enough to require the assistance of an experienced real estate attorney.

WHAT YOU SHOULD DO TO PROTECT YOURSELF.

There is not much the seller needs to do to guard against contract disputes other than to play fair and hire experienced real estate professionals to assist with the sale. The buyer should do the same, but keep in mind there are so many unknowns from the buyer side of the transaction, a buyer cannot afford to be anything less than vigilant. “Let the buyer beware. A simple checklist may go a long way toward guarding the unsuspecting buyer from a disastrous transaction.

BUYER’S CHECK LIST

1. Consider making your purchase subject to financing, even if you are not dependent upon financing. This may give you an escape option you might not otherwise have.

2. Require a Warranty Deed and an insured closing through a reputable title company, whenever possible.

3. Make your offer subject to inspection, and then hire an inspector to inspect the home. Don’t sign a contract with an inspector, if he limits his liability in any substantial way. It is not unreasonable, however, to limit their liability to matters which can be seen by a visual inspection.

4. Be sure to have a pest inspection. This type of inspection is usually not included within the scope of a standard home inspection.

5. Have a survey performed by a licensed surveyor and then review the survey and the property by personal inspection to rule out the possibility that structures on the real estate or neighboring real estate are encroaching and to insure the existing structure does not violate any city or neighborhood set-backs.

6. Review the Indiana Seller’s Real Estate Sales Disclosure Form carefully, and ask about matters that might not be disclosed on the form, such as prior illegal drug dealing activity at the location, and other psychologically related history. (No such form is required for new construction or for sellers who never owned or lived in the home, such as the County Sheriff, or the Executor of an estate).

7. Ask for a copy of the covenants. Under Indiana law, a buyer of residential real estate can withdraw the purchase offer, if they make a timely objection to the covenants. So be sure to obtain a copy, review it carefully, and prepare to object timely, if you can’t abide by the restrictions and obligations set forth within the covenants.

8. Require licensed contractors to perform all work required by any inspection response and always, always, always have the inspector re-inspect the property after the work has been completed to insure the work was performed properly and according to code. You won’t get another bite of this apple after the deed transfers into your name.

9. Have a radon test performed, and if radon is discovery, make sure remediation is confirmed prior to closing. The EPA recommends remedial action be taken, if radon is discovered above 0.4 pCi/L.

10. If you are buying from a builder or developer, require a written warranty and a signed vendor’s affidavit at closing.

11. Never close without a title search.

12. Insure access to the property is either directly connected to a county or state road, and if it is not, insure a proper easement is in place to insure you won’t be held hostage by a neighbor on whose property the driveway may traverse.

13. When purchasing a home with new appliances demand all owner’s manuals and product warranty information, where applicable.

14. Never waive the walk-through prior to closing.

Here are a few more items to know about.

TITLE ISSUES

Ownership of real estate is evidenced by a deed of conveyance. Conveyance requires a document containing a legal description indicating the Seller is granting to the Buyer the real estate described therein. It also requires the deed be delivered by the Seller to the Buyer. It does not require the deed be recorded. However, recording your deed is the best way to insure your deed is valid and superior to any subsequent deeds of conveyance from the same Seller.

Common problems with title to real estate include errors in the deed, liens, encumbrances, restrictive covenants, easements, survivorship rights, incompetency of grantor, bankruptcy, divorce, encroachments, judgment liens, tenants, and Lis Pendens notices. When your purchase is closed through a title company, a title search is expected to reveal problems that might interfere with a buyer’s interest. When problems are discovered, they are either resolved, waived, or unable to be resolved, in which case the closing will almost always be halted. However, some problems don’t get discovered until after closing, and sometimes closings occur without a title search, as might be the case when closing a cash sale or land sale contract.

Where the buyer is purchasing without an insured closing or without the benefits of title insurance, the following checklist should be helpful to avoid the more common problems clouding title.

1. Order a title search prior to closing. (A title search does not give you title insurance).

2. Order a survey. You may not need a staked survey, unless there are structures that appear to be situated close to the presumed property lines.

3. Search the public records for Lis Pendens notices, which are typically filed with the clerk of the Courts in the county where the real estate is situated.

4. While at the clerk’s office, do a search for the Sellers’ names to make sure there are no active lawsuits or unsatisfied judgments against them. Buying real estate from a Seller who has an unsatisfied judgment could subject your property to the judgment lien. (Information found at the clerk’s office will typically appear on a title search).

5. Review any covenants for limitations on the use of the property.

6. If there is any reason to suspect the Seller is not of sound mind or incapacitated in any way, then hire a lawyer to help you find out and look for ways of avoiding a void or voidable real estate transaction.

7. Search the federal bankruptcy records to make sure the Seller is not currently in bankruptcy. Once a Chapter 7 or 13 bankruptcy proceeding is filed the Bankruptcy Trustee usually takes over legal control of the property making a conveyance without the Trustee’s consent void. (This information will typically appear in a title search).

8. A search that reveals your seller is a party to a pending divorce could signal problems as well. Indiana law treats all real estate owned by a married individual as marital property, which may give the spouse rights to the property even if his or her name is not on the deed.

9. If you are purchasing on contract, make sure the Deed is signed and will be held in escrow by an institution independent from the seller that can be expected to be in existence when the payoff is anticipated.

10. Purchasers in a land sale contract should also require their payments be sent directly to the Seller’s mortgage company, if possible, to guard against foreclosure. This is a common problem for purchasers in these types of sales.

11. The same issues regarding mortgage payments should apply to the payment of property taxes and casualty insurance.

HIDDEN DEFECTS WITHIN THE BUILDING STRUCTURE

It is nearly impossible to build a perfect home or building. Problems occur due to poor quality workmanship or materials. Sometimes external forces can cause construction systems and appliances to fail. The list of problems that commonly occur are too numerous to mention here, but there are some fundamental things even the most inexperienced buyer can look for.

The roof and the foundation are two fundamental components that should never be overlooked. Shingled roofing which shows signs of aging, such as missing shingles or discoloration, may be due for a replacement. Foundations with noticeable cracks may indicate serious structural problems exist elsewhere within the structure. Highwater marks in the basement evidence flooding problems. Uneven floors, doors that do not close properly and cracks in drywall or plaster are also indications of foundation problems. If you see any of these issues, think twice about making an offer, unless you are prepared to live with problems that will almost certainly result, even if repairs are made prior to closing.

It may surprise you to learn that once you make an offer to purchase subject to inspection, that you are bound to follow through with the purchase even if your inspection reveals problems, provided the Seller agrees to fix those problems. The only exception under Indiana law is typically that you may rescind the agreement, if you find major structural problems.

Frequently, a buyer asks for the problems noted in the inspection to be repaired prior to closing, and the Seller agrees to repair, but the Buyer learns all too late the problems are not properly repaired. This is often due to the Seller attempting to do the repairs himself rather than hiring it out to licensed contractors, and the Buyer failing to have a follow up inspection conducted.

While this article is not intended to address common problems associated with the purchase of commercial properties, it is not uncommon for properties which once served as a commercial property to become residential. Where that is the case, an environmental survey should also be performed, especially if there is any reason to believe the prior commercial use was related to any type of enterprise where toxic or hazardous chemicals were used. Underground tanks can become a huge headache for unsuspecting buyers, because they will eventually breakdown and leak and the residual contents in those tanks will leach into the soil and contaminate everything it comes into contact with, including drinking water from nearby wells.

BOUNDARY ENCROACHMENTS

Boundary lines are determined by the legal description. They are not determined by fence lines and other physical structures. In other words, you can’t tell where the property line is simply by looking at structures built upon it. Therefore, it is important to know where the property lines are before you purchase.

Garages, driveways, fences, and utility lines are among the most common structures found to encroach upon another land owner’s property. Resolving encroachment problems can be very expensive, especially where a structure must be moved or torn down.

Having a survey performed prior to closing is the easiest way to shift responsibility for these problems back to the Seller prior to closing. Failing to catch an encroachment problem after you close may leave you with no recourse against the seller, unless you can prove they defrauded you in the Seller’s Residential Real Estate Disclosure Form.

ZONING PROBLEMS

Buying a home in a platted subdivision is not likely to lead to zoning problems, provided your intended use of the property is simply residential, but many homes don’t exist in these residential developments. For properties that are not located in a residential subdivision, be sure to do your homework.

Zoning dictates the way a property can be used and where and how structures can be built. Almost all properties in Indiana have setback requirements for building purposes. It is good to know what those setbacks are before you buy. It is also helpful to know how other properties near the property you are interested are zoned.

When zoning conflicts arise, property owners typically seek out the assistance of a real estate attorney to help them either petition the local zoning board for a rezoning order, or a variance, which is like a temporary re-zoning and it typically expires upon the sale of the property to another seller or change of use.

Be sure to carefully review the seller’s statements on the Indiana Residential Real Estate Sales Disclosure form as they pertain to zoning, and everything else on that form for that matter. If zoning issues arise later, this may be your only port in the storm.

EASEMENT ISSUES

When a utility company or neighboring property owner desire the right to use a portion of another property owner’s real estate, they typically secure that right by means of an agreement, called an easement, which is recorded in the county Recorder’s Office. These easements are called appurtenant easements and they run with the land. This means the easement will remain and pass with the property when the property is sold. The property owned by those granted the right to use the other property is considered the dominant parcel. The property granting the use is the subservient parcel.

One common problem occurs where a new property owner discovers his driveway passes over a neighbor’s property, but no easement was ever created. This might happen, for example, where the one property owner granted the neighbor a license to use the property. Since the license expires upon the sale of the property, the new owners may find themselves cut off from the use of the driveway to their home.

It is imperative to know before purchasing whether the property has direct unfettered access to a public thoroughfare. If not, stop the presses! Secure an easement with the aid of the Seller before closing.

INSECT ISSUES

Insects are everywhere and usually in places you can’t see with a casual inspection. Some insects, such as cockroaches and bedbugs pose a serious health concern. Others, such as Carpenter Bees, Carpenter Ants, and Termites pose a threat to the building structure itself.

Experts say termite damage costs homeowners billions of dollars every year in the United States. They work fast and silently and, if unchecked, they can do sever damage to the structure of any building or home.

Have a Wood Destroying Insect Infestation Inspection done at the same time as the Property Inspection. Remember the best time to have the problem addressed is before you close. If you ask the Seller to treat the problem and he/she refuses, you may have the right to terminate your contract under Indiana law.

HAZARDOUS AND TOXIC MATERIALS

Much has been done in the last several decades to clean up hazardous waste. The Environmental Protection Agency is the federal enforcement agency in charge of sites where problems of hazardous waste and toxic materials contaminate the land. While they are aggressive administrators of the agency and its goals, they cannot be everywhere. Contamination continues to be a big problem, both in industrialized urban areas as well as rural areas where farming is the most prevalent industry.

Factories, whether they are actively manufacturing or not, may have a long-term contaminating impact on surrounding land. Farming operations may have a similar impact on surrounding real estate. For this reason, it is important to do your homework before you buy.

Rural areas tend to experience more problems with contaminated drinking water than urban areas because rural areas rely so much on wells as a water source. Some of the more common sources of this contamination come from farmland runoff containing animal feces, fertilizer, herbicides, and insecticides. Another common contributor is the poorly serviced or inadequate septic systems on site or from neighboring properties.

Environmental surveys can be expensive, but not as expensive as unknowingly purchasing a property with environmental problems. Ask the seller for copies of any prior environmental surveys. Consider having your own survey done. Commonly a Phase I environmental study can determine whether there is evidence of contamination on the site or surrounding properties without the expense of core sampling. If a phase I assessment reveals cause for concern, then a Phase II might be required to conduct core samples, and when contaminants found, a phase III may be required to assess the full scope of the problem. For commercial and industrial real estate purchases, banks typically require some environmental assessment. Purchasers of residential real estate near farms or other commercial or industrial sites may find it prudent to follow the same course of action.

NEIGHBORHOOD COVENANT ISSUES

Real estate which is developed as part of a residential plat plan or industrial or commercial park, frequently comes with private land use and development restrictions attached to it. These private restrictions are placed on the land when the owner or developer of the larger development places restrictions on the use of the individual parcels sold to individual buyers. These restrictions are generally intended to harmonize the use of the real estate with neighboring parcels, and help insure minimum standards with the hope subsequent owners will refrain from activity that would harm the value of the development.

Covenants may specify the set-back lines for buildings, the size and style of structures, the materials which must be used to erect the structures, even the type of flowers you are permitted to plant in the front yard. Covenants may affect a great many aspects of a property owner’s use.

Amending or vacating the covenants typically requires a unanimous consent of all property owners within the development. Alternatively, the purchase by one buyer of all parcels within the development would also vacate the easements by the doctrine of merger. Consequently, covenants are generally scene as permanent restrictions. Given the rigidity of such restrictions, it is crucial for purchasers to become acquainted with these covenants before purchasing.

For residential purchasers who submit written purchase offers, they are entitled to withdraw their offer to purchase, if they timely object to any provision found within such covenants. The timeline for raising such an objection is ten days from the date the covenants are submitted to the purchaser. This is one of the few “escape hatches” to a purchase agreement under Indiana law.

PREDATORY LENDING

The term “Predatory Lending” is a catchall phrase referring to abuses lenders sometimes employ unfairly and deceptively to the disadvantage of unsuspecting borrowers. These abuses typically occur in the “sub-prime” end of the residential mortgage industry and include the following:

  • Inadequate disclosures in the loan process;
  • Risk-Based interest rates (pricing);
  • Inflated or unwarranted closing fees associated with the loan;
  • Requiring or urging borrowers to buy loan insurance (Loan Packing);
  • Use of balloon payments to trigger future refinancing fees;
  • Negative amortization;
  • Unusually high pre-payment penalties.

Borrowers who suspect they are victims of predatory lending should consult a real estate attorney. One option a borrower has through the Truth In Lending Act (TILA) is the right of rescission. They may also sue for actual damages.

REAL ESTATE SETTLEMENT PROCEDURES ACT (RESPA)

The Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) was enacted by the United States Congress in 1974 to protect home buyers from being cheated by unscrupulous real estate professionals. The Act applies to all real estate closings that deal with government insured loans. Commercial and construction loans are generally exempt from these regulations. The Act is designed to tightly control the procedures used to close a residential real estate transaction and insure the consumer is given timely, relevant, and accurate information about their loan and the closing process. The Act also made the common practice of paying out “undisclosed kick-backs and referral fees” illegal.

Borrowers have three (3) days in which to rescind their loan and this information must be made known to them during the closing of the loan, as required by RESPA. Rescission may also be an appropriate remedy where the lender otherwise violated RESPA requirements. Alternatively, violations of RESPA can lead to the recovery of actual damages plus attorney fees, and is most often used in defense of a mortgage foreclosure action. Borrowers, who believe they may have been victimized by someone during the closing can send a Qualified Written Request (QWR) to their lender requesting information pertaining to their loan and associated closing documents. Upon receipt, the lender must provide the requested information within 30 days. The information obtained as a result of the QWR may help document a RESPA violation. This can be a game changer for homeowners facing foreclosure.

FRAUD

For disgruntled real estate purchasers, fraud is the key that opens the lock to a lawsuit they would not otherwise be able to maintain. This is because Indiana permits sellers to use the “Merger by Deed” defense to lawsuits against them by buyers who believe the real estate somehow fails to exhibit the qualities they expected when they agreed to purchase. The rule provides absent fraud or mutual mistake of fact, all prior and contemporaneous negotiations, or executory agreements, oral or written, leading up to the execution of the deed are merged into the deed and are thereby satisfied. That leaves fraud and mutual mistake, and of the two, fraud is generally most supportable.

Fraud is generally defined as the making of an intentionally false statement of past or present fact, to another party, who justifiably relies upon the statement and suffers some form of detriment or injury. Note that “future facts”, such as “I’ll gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today” must be distinguished from past or present facts, because future facts that turn out to be false are merely broken promises. They are broken contracts, while false statements of past or present facts make the claim that some fact exists now or existed in the past.

Fraud is criminal in nature and forms the basis for many lawsuits filed by dissatisfied purchasers, when their newly purchased home turns out to be a lemon or not as represented by the seller. The two primary documents that provide the evidence are the listing itself, and more importantly the Indiana Residential Real Estate Seller’s Disclosure Form (“Seller’s Disclosure”). The Seller’s Disclosure is signed under oath by the seller when the real estate is first listed for sale, and again at closing.

Because the standard of proof for a fraud claim is clear and convincing evidence, a purchaser must have very strong evidence to demonstrate the seller knowingly made false statements on the disclosure form. Absent clear and convincing evidence, a purchaser will find it difficult to succeed with any type of claim against the seller.

WARRANTY ISSUES

A warranty is like an insurance policy that gives the holder the right to have an item of property, real or personal, replaced or repaired, by the party extending the warranty. The warranty is a benefit paid for with bargained for consideration, and where the consumer has not fully paid the seller, the requisite consideration may not trigger the benefits of the warranty.

Warranties related to real estate transactions generally include builders’ warranties, contractors’ warranties, third-party home-buyer warranties, appliance warranties, and implied warranties. Under Indiana law, builders who sell new homes must provide a written (10-4-2) warranty which warrants against major structural problems for ten (10) years from the purchase date, roof shingles and structure for four (4) years from the purchase date, and all other workmanship and materials for two (2) years from the purchase date. Implied warranties of habitability, good workmanship, and fitness for a particular purpose may also apply, unless specifically excluded by appropriate language placed within the purchase agreement that meets Indiana’s construction warranty statutes.

Sellers and buyers of existing homes may also incorporate a limited warranty for used homes into the sale. Such a warranty is sometimes paid for by the seller as an incentive to the purchaser. It is sometimes obtained by the purchaser at their own expense to help insure against the unknown.

Warranties issued by appliance manufacturers become binding contracts between the manufacturer and the home buyer once the products are registered with the manufacturer. Claims that arise under these arrangements must be resolved by the owner and manufacturer, typically without the involvement of the builder or seller.

One important thing to know about any warranty is that they usually expire after a certain amount of time, and they are almost always triggered only when the consumer follows the specific directions found within the warranty itself about notice to the party obligated to back the warranty.

MOLD PROBLEMS

There are over 100,000 types of mold. Mold, in general, is not particularly dangerous, except when individuals with hypersensitivity to allergens encounter its spores. Those with hypersensitivity to mold may suffer asthma, lung infections, or sinus attacks. Sometimes mold can become toxic, which can cause those who come in to contact with it to become very sick, even if they don’t have any hypersensitivity to mold. Some toxic mold spores have been blamed as the cause of death to infants and pets.

It is difficult to pin liability for the growth of mold on any individual person or entity, because mold is known to grow anywhere there is moisture. All homes have moisture. Therefore, proving the seller or builder is somehow responsible for the growth or existence of mold may be difficult. It may be a bit easier for a tenant to hold a landlord liable, particularly where the landlord is responsible for the maintenance of the home.

SUMMARY

The issues described above represent common real estate problems affecting the sale of real estate. They are by no means an exhaustive list. What is obvious from this brief survey of real estate related issues, is that there are a great number of legal issues that affect real estate and the people who buy and sell it. When things go wrong, consult with a qualified experienced real estate lawyer, and take steps to protect your rights and your investment.

Home Contractors

Building an Energy Efficient Home – Solving Disputes over Indiana Energy Codes

By | Contractor Law | No Comments

Building an energy efficient home is an exciting and sometimes daunting project. Most people in this energy minded century want their home to be as energy efficient as possible within their means. Disputes may arise during the process regarding codes and in particular the 2012 Indiana Energy and Conservation Code 


Building an Energy Efficient HomeArchitects and builders have had some trouble complying with these recent codes. So, what is a home builder/consumer to do when disputes arise? One avenue now available to home builders, who may also be consumers, is the following:


“Indiana Code 22-13-5 grants the Building Law Compliance Officer (formerly known as the Building Commissioner) in the Indiana Department of Homeland Security the authority to interpret a building law or a fire safety law. These interpretations may be issued upon the written request of an interested person, which refers to a person that has a dispute with a county or a municipality regarding the interpretation of a building law or a fire safety law. Further, the Building Law Compliance Officer may issue a written interpretation of a building law or fire safety law whether or not the county or municipality has taken any action to enforce the building law or fire safety law. This means a home builder does not have to wait to be red tagged before requesting a written interpretation. Finally, a written interpretation binds the interested person and the county or municipality with whom the interested person has the dispute until the written interpretation is overruled by the Indiana Fire Prevention and Building Safety Commission. A written interpretation of a building law or fire safety law binds all counties and municipalities if the Building Law Compliance Officer publishes the written interpretation of the building law or fire safety law in the Indiana Register.”


Home builders or any “interested person” who have disputes regarding these Codes can now contact the Building Law Compliance Officer to have code interpretations reviewed and interpreted. Once the interpretation is published by the Compliance Officer and if favorable to the builder or “interested person”, it can only be overruled by the Indiana Fire Prevention and Building Safety Commission. So, building can continue until that time.


An interested person “ refers to a person that has a dispute with a county or a municipality regarding the interpretation of a building law or a fire safety law”, which if interpreted correctly, includes consumers as well as builders. However, it’s highly likely that those who will use this new avenue for dispute resolution, will in fact be general contractors or professional developers/builders, who may be found to be non-compliant. Savvy consumers acting as GCs for the building of their own homes may also be able to use this to their advantage. But how the average consumer, who hires a builder or developer, but has issues with potential non-compliance, will use this avenue of dispute resolution, if at all, remains to be seen.


Though likely to be used mostly by professional builders, this option for disputes could also be an avenue for the normal consumer who hires a GC to build their home. IF, they know about it, that is. If you have concerns or questions on building an energy efficient home, contact Indy Advocate on more information on this subject matter.

 

mold on wood

Problems With a Home Warranty

By | Contractor Law, Real Estate Law | No Comments

For one Indiana consumer, doing business with one of Indiana’s largest custom home builders was an absolute nightmare.  At the conclusion of the construction process, the builder, Hallmark Homes, Inc., persuaded her to sign a “zero punch list” based on the builder’s promise to remediate all problems under the builder’s “bumper to bumper home warranty”.  Then when she asked the builder to make good on their promise, the builder told her those issues weren’t covered under the warranty.

home warrantyAmong the issues Hallmark refused to remediate was a perpetually wet crawlspace that lead to a massive breakout of mold, and warped vinyl siding.   Adding to her frustration was the realization that she had signed a contract drafted by the builder that required her to use the builder’s pre-selected arbitrator to arbitrate the dispute.  The contract and home warranty were perfectly legal documents designed to essentially protect the builder at every turn.  That’s when she hired a construction attorney and began the arduous task of turning the tables on her builder. Shari Obermeyer stated, “

  • How did you come to select this builder?
  • What did you do to investigate the builder prior to signing a contract with them?
  • What did your attorney do that turned this thing around for you?
  • Did you get a good result in your arbitration award?
  • What advise would you give someone who was preparing to hire a builder to build their new home?

Indianapolis attorney, Rob McNevin, a partner with Kreider McNevin Schiff, LLP, said there are a number of things you should know before contracting with a builder.  Among the most important things a consumer should know are:

  1. Hire a real estate or construction attorney to look over the contract before you sign it.
  2. Don’t depend on the warranty to address pre-closing issues.  Force the seller to complete all issues prior to closing, while you can rely on contract principals to enforce your rights.
Indiana Home Improvement Act

Indiana Home Improvement Act

By | Contractor Law, Real Estate Law | No Comments

Indiana Home Improvement ActHomeowners in Indiana are protected from unscrupulous contractors by a consumer protection statute called the Indiana Home Improvement Act. The statute can be found at I.C. 24-5-11-1. While this statute is designed to protect homeowners, it can be difficult to read and comprehend. One of the more confusing aspects of this statute is that it does not tell the consumer what to do if the contractor they are working with violates the statute. In order for the consumer to take action under the Indiana Home Improvement Act, they must apply Indiana’s Deceptive Practice Act.

Indiana Home Improvement Act

Indiana’s Deceptive Practice Act, which can be found at I.C. 24-5-0.5-1 prohibits many commonly used business practices which are deemed unfair to consumers. Indiana’s Deceptive Practice Act specifically lists violations of Indiana’s Home Improvement Act as being a deceptive practice act. The two acts must be read carefully and followed precisely in order for a consumer to secure the protections both statutes were designed to provide. Unfortunately for most consumers they either don’t know about the protections of these statutes, or they fail to understand how to use them. Consumers and even attorneys who fail to properly apply the law may lose out on some very helpful features hidden in the confusing language of those statutes. Consumers would be well advised to hire an attorney with experience in handling matters that fall under these statutes. If you have had a problem with contractors regarding faulty fire pit additions that have been installed an attorney that is skilled in mechanic liens is advised.

One of the key advantages consumers may gain by properly following these two consumer protection statutes is the right to recover their attorney fees, if they hire a lawyer to enforce their rights. This is a very important advantage in disputes with contractors, because generally litigants in civil lawsuits do not have the right to recover their attorney fees, unless they have a contract which gives them that right or a statute that provides for that specific type of recovery. Since contractors rarely write provisions into their contracts that give homeowners the right to recover their attorney fees, the Indiana Deceptive Practice Act does just that. Having the right to recover attorney fees is a huge advantage in any dispute and that fact can make all the difference where consumers are simply engaged in pre-litigation settlement discussions, and quite obviously after litigation begins.

If you have a dispute with your contractor, be sure to hire a lawyer who knows how to use these statutes to your advantage.

Indiana lien law

No Lien Contracts in Indiana

By | Contractor Law, Liens, Mechanic's Lien | No Comments

No-Lien Contracts in IndianaUnder Indiana law suppliers of labor, materials and equipment have the right, under certain circumstances, to hold and enforce a mechanic lien to insure they are paid for their efforts.  Those lien rights can be quite vexing for the property owner, when payment issues arise.  In order to avoid the problems associated with mechanic liens, property owners and general contractors may specify in their contracts that the contractors and subcontractors waive their rights to record a mechanic lien.  However, such provisions, under Indiana law, are null and void on commercial construction projects pursuant to Indiana Code 32-28-3-16.

No Lien Contracts in Indiana

Essentially, no lien contracts in Indiana are fair game for Class 2 structures.  Under this same statute, “class 2 structures” as well as projects involving certain types of public utilities, are excluded.  Indiana Code 22-12-1-5 defines a class 2 structure as any building that contains one or two dwelling units.  It does not require the owner to live in one of those units, but it does require that the unit(s) be used as a residence.  Essentially residential buildings with one or two units are exempt from the prohibition of the commercial no-lien contracts.

Where a contract for a commercial project contains a no-lien provision, the contract itself is not void, but rather the offending provision(s) within the contract are void and unenforceable.  Any provision in a commercial construction contract that attempts to bar contractors from filing such liens or otherwise contain language that would require them to waive such lien rights before they are paid for their services is void and unenforceable.

It is apparent that the general assembly felt the size and scope of commercial projects had the potential to do great harm to subcontractors, if no-lien contract provisions were permitted.  They did not have the same concerns for subcontractors working on residential properties and therefore, subcontractors working on residential properties should take care to insure that the owners has not recorded a no-lien contract with the county recorder in an effort to eliminate those lien rights.

The no-lien contract provision is alive and well for owners or general contractors who wish to keep liens from being recorded and enforced on residential construction projects in Indiana.  The statutory support for this no-lien contract is found at Indiana Code 32-28-3-1(e) and (f).   In order to properly utilize this no-lien provision, the contract must be in writing, provide an accurate legal description of the real estate, be notarized, and recorded with the county recorder within five (5) days of the date the contract was fully executed.  Failure to satisfy these requirements will void the no-lien provision.

Web Statistics